Search for: All records

Summary Functional principal component analysis has been shown to be invaluable for revealing variation modes of longitudinal outcomes, which serve as important building blocks for forecasting and model building. Decades of research have advanced methods for functional principal component analysis, often assuming independence between the observation times and longitudinal outcomes. Yet such assumptions are fragile in real-world settings where observation times may be driven by outcome-related processes. Rather than ignoring the informative observation time process, we explicitly model the observational times by a general counting process dependent on time-varying prognostic factors. Identification of the mean, covariance function and functional principal components ensues via inverse intensity weighting. We propose using weighted penalized splines for estimation and establish consistency and convergence rates for the weighted estimators. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed estimators are substantially more accurate than the existing ones in the presence of a correlation between the observation time process and the longitudinal outcome process. We further examine the finite-sample performance of the proposed method using the Acute Infection and Early Disease Research Program study. 

Summary Unobserved confounding presents a major threat to causal inference in observational studies. Recently, several authors have suggested that this problem could be overcome in a shared confounding setting where multiple treatments are independent given a common latent confounder. It has been shown that under a linear Gaussian model for the treatments, the causal effect is not identifiable without parametric assumptions on the outcome model. In this note, we show that the causal effect is indeed identifiable if we assume a general binary choice model for the outcome with a non-probit link. Our identification approach is based on the incongruence between Gaussianity of the treatments and latent confounder and non-Gaussianity of a latent outcome variable. We further develop a two-step likelihood-based estimation procedure.